<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday morning linkroll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://resistmedia.net/blog/2007/04/23/monday-morning-linkroll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://resistmedia.net/blog/2007/04/23/monday-morning-linkroll/</link>
	<description>This is a blog about adventures in design, and sometimes other crap.  My name is Beth Dean and I'm a web designer from Cleveland Ohio. I work for Progressive Insurance as a UX Developer.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://resistmedia.net/blog/2007/04/23/monday-morning-linkroll/#comment-18435</link>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resistmedia.net/blog/2007/04/23/monday-morning-linkroll/#comment-18435</guid>
		<description>First of all, you didn't mention NOW in your article, you mentioned this woman in St. Louis. Secondly, NOW is a passive aggressive, homophobic and revisionist organization, and their views beyond abortion and workplace equality don't generally align with radical feminists.  

However, this NOW article doesn't even insinuate the players are guilty but instead critiques the treatment of victims of rape, racist and sexist stereotypes, and sickening entertainment value our media places on rape. 

Your article generalizes all feminists as knee jerk reactionists, and that is the problem I have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, you didn&#8217;t mention NOW in your article, you mentioned this woman in St. Louis. Secondly, NOW is a passive aggressive, homophobic and revisionist organization, and their views beyond abortion and workplace equality don&#8217;t generally align with radical feminists.  </p>
<p>However, this NOW article doesn&#8217;t even insinuate the players are guilty but instead critiques the treatment of victims of rape, racist and sexist stereotypes, and sickening entertainment value our media places on rape. </p>
<p>Your article generalizes all feminists as knee jerk reactionists, and that is the problem I have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David R. Usher</title>
		<link>http://resistmedia.net/blog/2007/04/23/monday-morning-linkroll/#comment-18224</link>
		<dc:creator>David R. Usher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resistmedia.net/blog/2007/04/23/monday-morning-linkroll/#comment-18224</guid>
		<description>My article about feminists pretending that the duke players are still somehow guilty is absolutetly corect.   See the NOW website, which takes the same position as the radical feminist I debated in the television interview.

http://www.now.org/issues/media/061506duke.html

Time to wake up and smell your bacon burning.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My article about feminists pretending that the duke players are still somehow guilty is absolutetly corect.   See the NOW website, which takes the same position as the radical feminist I debated in the television interview.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.now.org/issues/media/061506duke.html" >http://www.now.org/issues/media/061506duke.html</a></p>
<p>Time to wake up and smell your bacon burning&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
