Web Designers Please Stop Doing This

Everywhere you look these days sites using some variation of the above template are getting accolades. What is wrong with us?
I have been kicking around my general gripes about the state of “design” in web design for a while now but wasn’t inspired to write an article until I saw Paul Scrivens’ Smashing Magazine Killed the Community, and was in almost complete agreement.
Where is the value in compiling other people’s content or screenshots of their sites offering no additional input other than to regurgitate it as your own for the sake of a few Diggs? And where is the credibility in these Top 10 Crazy Ass Things to Do With Type sites anyway? Have you ever seen a truly reputable designer you know writing for them? And now they’re selling you a book. All these sites do is glorify trends and cliches.
This got me to thinking, whatever happened to the CSS galleries of yore? Now there are scores of them, all the featured sites with the same cookie cutter layout. I don’t think the problem is as Paul said, that CSS galleries were something easy to replicate. I think the problem is one of content. These sites aren’t scouring for anything pushing boundaries, they passively accept suggestions and post accordingly. Now that people with dollar signs in their eyes are flocking to the industry in droves, an appetite for this garbage has been cultivated.
I can understand how sites like this might be good reference for someone just beginning their career, a starting point to see what’s been done before, but they become dangerous when they preach trends as gospel and all of a sudden every new site on the internet looks the same. Remember Web 2.0? Where did all those designers go? Gradients, drop shadows and rounded corners gave way to Photoshop effects, mismatched social media icons and poorly executed grunge type. Do we really want to be the David Carsons of the web industry, slowly becoming caricatures of ourselves? Once upon a time we had wonderful places to go for web inspiration, like Stylegala.
Now it’s time to stop looking at the web for inspiration. So many people in this industry do not come from a design background, we need to get back to design basics. Design school 101. Real typography, not just “picking out a cool font”. Grids, and not out of the box solutions, but thinking about a real working grid for our sites. Using an out of the box grid is equivalent to using an out of the box Wordpress template with no regard to how it fits your content at all. Color. Strip away Photoshop techniques. Software is just a tool, designs should be able to survive without effects and shadows. Stop designing your content for your CMS and work the other way around. Want to learn about storytelling? Take a comic book illustration class, even if you can’t draw.
You’re not going to find a quick solution for good design in a top ten list. Real design is hard, that’s why we expect to be paid well for it. Stop listening to people spend a lot of time talking about web design but doing very little design themselves, and instead go back to real designers. Start at the beginning. Start at Bauhaus. Start at De Stijl. Start at military propaganda art. Start anywhere but with freaking web design.

P.S. Can we please stop doing this also? This is like lens flare part two.
There are 2 comments
I don’t really have a problem with that layout, for some sites. As you say it all depends on the content. For some it works, same way a newspaper works, because its expected. But I agree it can’t (and shouldn’t) fit everything.
As for the CSS galleries I personally gave up on those a couple of years ago. They used to be a go-to resource showing how people were wrestling CSS and the browsers to deliver a really interesting site. I looked forward to trying to discover just how they did, whatever new-fangled trick they slipped in. If you’re adding 20-30 sites a day and they all look vaguely the same its not saying anything.
Smashing Mag is OK but I do look at it just as version of Digg or Reddit. Its a barometer of tips & tricks currently doing the circuit, much like WebMonkey or A List Apart was when they first started out.
PS - Those out of focus lightbulbs. I blame MAC users. You’d never get that from a PC user
I agree completely with you Beth.
Designing without understanding leads to failure. So many designs are doomed to fail from the beginning because their reason for existing isn’t communicated well through the design.
The quality of graphic design skills has improved dramatically over the past couple of years. The quality of interaction design has also improved dramatically the last few years. So then why are there so many piss poor designs out there?
Maybe its the age of the designers. More and more we’re leaning on kids with incredible design talents. These kids are mean when it comes to photoshop, but they are not yet mature enough to understand what they are building.
Maybe its the dropping price of bargain design. With less money on the table, less time is allocated to the projects. Too often this means we rush through initial planning and research and linger on the polishing stages at the end.
Pretty websites are nice, but if they fail to meet their obligation to exist, then they may as well have never been created.
This is my beef with WordPress theme sites. The sites exist only to make your blog prettier. They can’t possibly communicate through design since they are generic by their very nature.
Create your own unique, quality offering. Be that content as blog posts, podcasts, products, services or other means and then design your site to match the offering. This is so fundamental, yet so overlooked.
Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this section entry.